<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<atom:link href="http://www.castlemzx.net/data/feed/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<title>castlemzx</title>
<description>personal website of asgromo</description>
<link>http://www.castlemzx.net/</link>

<item>
	<title>9-11</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<img class="center" src="http://www.castlemzx.net/images/twintowers.png" alt="[img: twin towers]" />
<br />On 11 September 2001 I was in my Grade 7 Computer Applications class learning about computer applications when the story sort of broke. A plane had crashed into the twin towers (!!). No, a BIG plane (!!!!!)
<br />
<br />In home room we stared up at the news coverage on the wall-mounted television. "We're gonna nuke 'em," a pasty little kid repeated, dead-eyed.
<br />
<br />The onscreen action appeared viscerally frightening, but my initial response was only disquiet&mdash;a sensation like the hazy memory of dark, mean entities from a dream.
<br />]]></description>
	<link>http://www.castlemzx.net/index.php?i=9-11</link>
	<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>fun comments on the ground zero mosque, in response to Michael Moore </title>
	<description><![CDATA[<h4>Steven Best</h4>
<br />i love you michael, but the first time i think you are way off from the reality...about the masque yes we deserve the masque in the site of 911, but only because we did nothing there for 10 years....its a shame!! twin towers must builded back there 8 years ago, even taller than before, and painted red white blue....but no....for ten years nobody cares.....now we have this unreal joke about the masque.....the whole world laughing on us again.....
<br />you know michael...sofar all big empires falled apart and the only reason was= they tryed to understand the smaller ones, tryed to compromised, try to be fair.....start singing cumbaha to everyone.... if the masque build there the USA is over forever. the game over. sakk mate......you are dead wrong on this one michael....but i still love you!!
<br />
<br />
<br /><h4>AverageJoe</h4>
<br />The supporters of the mosque clearly have the right to build the mosque near ground zero, and no one has ever said they don't have the right to build a mosque near ground zero. As usual the radical left is trying to distort and lie about the facts of an issue, in order to confuse and deceive the uninformed public. Of course what debate would not also include the standard and disgracefully radical left debate tactic of demonizing those with whom they oppose, in a effort to discredit anyone who dare disagree with the radical-left. We must always remember freedom of speech only applies to those that agree with the radical-left nuts. 
<br />
<br />In reading Mr. Moore post I got more of the typical radical-left anti-Christianity / anti-American message, rather than any attempt to discuss the valid personal concerns and feelings of those whom oppose the mosque location. Yes, I said valid opinions, as in America, regardless of the political correctness of ones opinion, everyone is free to have and voice their own personal opinion. I understand the radical left normally has a selective view on when one has freedom of speech based on the message, but most Americas rejects this selective view of the radical left.
<br />
<br />The issue is not about having the right to build near ground zero, but about if building near ground zero is the proper place for the mosque. The right to build the mosque is not debatable and no government action has been taken to prevent the building of the mosque. The only action taken in opposition to the mosque has been citizens voicing their concerns and objections to the location of the mosque. While I have no personal view either way on the location of the mosque, I do find it interesting the length the radical-left has gone to demonize and attack private citizens for voicing their personal objections to the mosque. 
<br />
<br />If you feel the mosque should be built near or at ground zero, then support the effort 100%, but please avoid the standard radical-left child like behavior of demonizing and attcking your opposition on a personal level. While the radical-left usually have little facts or realitiy on their side in debates, this time the radical-left have some soild ground to actually voice their opinion in a reasonable and repectful way. The radical left should enjoy this rare opprotunity where their veiws on an issue are reasonable, and avoid the silly persoanl rants and hatered they normally include in a debate.
<br />
<br />FYI: If the mosque is build near ground zero, how long will it be till some insane radical right-wing nut flys a plane into the mosque ?
<br />
<br />
<br /><h4>13sector.com</h4>
<br />Michael,
<br />Glad you took this stand. 
<br />Am writing from a country where communal hatred is slowly undermining the democratic values of a nation that was built on Religious Freedom, India.
<br />We need someone radicle here like you!
<br />
<br />
<br /><h4>Cappuccino AddiK</h4>
<br />You are so wrong about building a mosque near ground zero, Mike! There are other places where they could build the mosque in Manhattan, but not in a place where something tragic has happened committed by criminals who did it for Allah. Mike, be sensitive and empathic in this situation. Don't think about teaching our government a lesson for now, but think about the millions of New Yorkers who are opposed to the project and understand why we feel this way.
<br />
<br />Besides, how is building a mosque near ground zero beneficial ? This is just going to promote another chaos, don't you think ?! The wounds still have not healed, Mike. On a bright side, there are other vacancies in the city where they could build it.
<br />
<br />
<br /><h4>spackle</h4>
<br />NO TROPHY MOSQUE!! You are wrong about this, Mike! The people you listed in #9 have not threatened to use or used violence against anyone if they burn a book or draw a cartoon. Muslim "extremists" do this, though. Just Google Theo VanGogh or Lars Vilks. These people want to come in on our freedoms and then get sufficient in number to destroy them and our way of life. It's happening all over Europe. We don't want their violence and terrorism here in America.
<br />
<br />
<br /><h4>Peacedriver</h4>
<br />As long as Fat Cat Racist are running this country nothing will ever change!
<br />]]></description>
	<link>http://www.castlemzx.net/index.php?i=themasque</link>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Government Shutdown 2</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/govshutdown.png" alt="[img: happy politicians]" />
<br />It didn't actually happen hooray!!!1
<br />]]></description>
	<link>http://www.castlemzx.net/index.php?i=govshutdown2</link>
	<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Government Shutdown</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<br />Remember very nearly fifteen years ago, when the United States federal government shut down because the Republican-controlled congress and the Bill Clinton administration couldn't agree to pass a continuing resolution until they could work out a real budget? I don't! I was barely seven years old!
<br />
<br />But today I researched it just a bit, because it seemed interesting and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_government_shutdown_of_1995">Wikipedia article</a> is slim on facts and sources. So I did some googling and turned up a <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/etc/11131995.html">transcript</a> from an episode of <i>Nightline</i> broadcast on the eve of the shutdown, <b>November 13, 1995</b>. The two interviews at the end, I think, are illustrative and entertaining. I bolded stuff I thought pertinent to politics today and the situation then.
<br />
<br /><div class="quote"><div><img class="align-left" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/45/Cokie_Roberts-a.jpg" alt="publicity headshot of NPR news analyst Cokie Roberts" /> 
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: Joining us from our Washington bureau, just out of the Oval Office meeting, Alice Rivlin, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget. Ms. Rivlin, tell us about the meeting. Was there any progress made on getting to opening the government anytime soon? </div>
<br />
<br /><div style="clear:both;"><img src="http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/experts/rivlina/rivlina_portrait.jpg" class="align-right" alt="Alice Rivlin in the flesh" />
<br />ALICE RIVLIN, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET: Well, it was a very frank and open exchange of views, as they say. <strong>The President was very strong. He had just finished vetoing the continuing resolution, the stop gap spending measure that had the Medicare premium increase on it, and he made very clear that that was unacceptable, that Medicare increases did not belong in this kind of an interim spending bill. And then everybody talked about how they felt about it, but no progress was made. We will, in fact, have to close the government tomorrow.</strong></div>
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: And how long do you expect it to stay closed? 
<br />
<br />ALICE RIVLIN: All of us hope that it isn't closed for very long, but this is a difficult negotiation, and it's very hard to tell. It might be one day, it might be two or three, or more. 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: Now, you heard John Cochran just say that there was a plan being circulated of pulling out the Medicare part of it and insisting on the President signing onto a balanced budget in seven years. Was that what you were hearing in the meeting? 
<br />
<br />ALICE RIVLIN: There was some of that in the meeting. <strong>I think the one thing that is clear is that Medicare is now off the table. The Republicans tried to attach a premium increase to the continuing resolution.</strong> It was vetoed by the President and they certainly don't have the votes to pass that over veto. 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: So- so the argument now is back to this fundamental balancing the budget argument? 
<br />
<br />ALICE RIVLIN: It's back to what conditions, if any, should there be on a continuing resolution? Now, we don't- 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: A continuing resolution meaning that piece of legislation to keep the government going? 
<br />
<br />ALICE RIVLIN: Exactly. And since all we're talking about - we're not talking about the budget here - <strong>we are talking about keeping the government going while the budget debate goes on. The Republicans haven't sent us a budget yet, they haven't finished their job. So we are only talking about how to keep the government open, and extraneous matters like Medicare premium increases don't belong on that kind of legislation.</strong>
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: Ms. Rivlin, you have been- now you're at the White House end of Pennsylvania Avenue. You have been at the other end, as head of the Congressional Budget Office. You have watched these shutdowns, where the government runs out of money, and all of that, for many years. The American people are saying, in all of the polls and all of the interviews, 'We're sick of this. We think that this government should do better than that.' I mean, what do you say to them? Why is this going on? Why are you all meeting in the middle of the night and not able to keep the government open? 
<br />
<br />ALICE RIVLIN: Well, I wish we weren't, and <strong>I think it's really quite stupid and counterproductive to be closing down the government. For reasons best known to themselves, the Republican majority in Congress decided they wanted to do that. They had a simple way out. They could have signed a clean, simple bill that would keep the government open, but they chose not to do that. They chose to attach to that bill conditions that they knew the President could not accept. They wanted him to veto, they wanted to close down the government.</strong> 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: But you've seen that happen over the years, too. <strong>I remember Democrats putting aid to the Contras on bills that they wanted President Reagan to sign.</strong> You've seen all of this go on, and apparently, what we're seeing now in the polls is a cumulative disgust over the years with what's been going on here. 
<br />
<br />ALICE RIVLIN: Well, that's not surprising, but the President feels very strongly that- not that we should close down the government, clearly we should not. But he cannot accept conditions that are simply against the values that this administration holds, and raising Medicare premiums is one of those, and accepting other conditions on the budget right now just cannot be done. 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: Of course, there are those who say that he is just playing politics with Medicare. Very quickly, do you have an answer to that? 
<br />
<br />ALICE RIVLIN: Politics is what presidents are elected to do, but politics is a very important thing. It is reflecting the values of the American people. <strong>There are two budgets before the Congress and before the public. The one that we are in favor of, we believe reflects the values of the American public, the common ground on which we stand. It is not extreme and it does get to balance.</strong>
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: All right. Thank you very much, Alice Rivlin. 
<br />
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: Joining us from Capitol Hill, Representative John Kasich, chairman of the House Budget Committee. Congressman Kasich, first of all, thank you for staying up so very late. You've just heard Alice Rivlin saying that they- that the President won't back down on basic values. Is there any backing down on the Republican side? 
<br />
<br /><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/71/John_Kasich.jpg/160px-John_Kasich.jpg" class="center" alt="a photo of representatitive john kasich" />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH, (R), CHAIRMAN, BUDGET COMMITTEE: <strong>Well, the most basic value, Cokie, is that we, frankly, balance the budget so that the next generation is going to have decent jobs and be able to buy a house. I mean, when mothers and fathers think about what their children are going to have in 15 years, they're very worried about it, and if we don't balance the budget, there will be a erosion of fundamental American values.</strong>
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: Well, is- 
<br />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH: <strong>So we're not going to back down from balancing the budget and saving the next generation.</strong> 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: But what about on this question of adding a balanced budget to this just short term, 18 day, by tomorrow 17 day, resolution to keep the government going, so that you don't have to go through all of this mess? 
<br />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH: Well, the continuing resolution is- is absolutely consistent with our plan to balance the budget. What we say in there is for programs that we flat out zero out, like the Interstate Commerce Commission, the oldest bureaucracy in America, we want to zero that out, we want to get started on that, and the administration says no. We didn't even zero it out in our continuing resolution, we funded it at 60 percent. They said, well, that's not good enough. Look, what we're doing in the short term is entirely consistent with what we want to do in the long term, and we want to stop the politics as usual. Cokie, look- 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: But- 
<br />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH: -two years ago, Tim Penny, a Democrat from Minnesota, and I fought the fight to cut one penny out of every dollar. The same special interests and the same administration worked us over, they defeated this bipartisan effort. We couldn't even cut a penny- 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: But you- 
<br />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH: -and <strong>I'll tell you, it's time for change</strong>. 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: -but you say you want to stop politics as usual. The voters clearly think this is not only politics as usual, but it's Washington as usual, and the same old mess that they hate in Washington, and in our poll tonight, it's Republicans, 64 percent of the people say Republicans are playing politics with this. 
<br />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH: I know. Cokie, <strong>the easiest thing to do in this city is pass out money. That's why we're $5 trillion in debt. That's why the next generation is in trouble. That's why a kid born today is going to give government 82 percent of everything he or she earns.</strong> We're- 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: But nobody- but you know, people don't disagree with you on that. People want to balance the budget, but they are saying they don't, in all of the polling, that they don't want to balance it your way. 
<br />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH: Look, the problem is, we're- our- under our plan to balance the budget, federal spending will increase by $3 trillion over the next seven years more than what we spent in the last seven years. If people knew that, they would go and say, 'Why are you spending so much?' Our problem is, the President runs around and uses the word 'extreme' and 'cuts' and everything else. We're not cutting spending, we're slowing the growth. The President, he doesn't have any budget. We sent his budget to be analyzed by the budget office here in Washington, and guess what- 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: Well- 
<br />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH: -they said he's got deficits of $200 billion in the out years. 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: Well- 
<br />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH: So, look, we're willing to sit down and negotiate priorities. We're willing to be flexible on that, but Cokie, this is the last best chance we have to save this next generation by just putting ourselves on a slight diet. When the people find out what this is, we're going to be fine. 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: Well, give me your sense of what happens now. There was a meeting in the middle of the night tonight. It broke up with everybody saying, 'We're nowhere.' Now what? 
<br />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH: Well, Leon Panetta and Alice Rivlin are going to come up here tomorrow and they're going to meet with Pete Domenici and- and me, and we're going to have a discussion about is there any common ground. And- 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: And meanwhile, the government's shut down, and it's costing us all money. 
<br />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH: Well, I've just to got to tell you, Cokie, that, you know, maybe we can work something out on a continuing resolution, but it's got to be consistent with the plan to balance the budget. We know that there's going to be some political hits we're going to take in this, but frankly, Cokie, in my career, this is the best chance I have to serve America. This is not about politics and trying to blame the other side. I've done more deals with Democrats, putting things together like Tim Penny, than any Republican, and you know that. This is about the principle of finally saying no to special interest groups, balancing the budget, and saving the children of the next generation and doing ourselves some good by lowering interest rates. 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: Thank you, John Kasich, chairman of the Budget Committee. We'll see if we get any kind of deal, and I'll be back- 
<br />
<br />REP JOHN KASICH: Well, I hope we will. 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: -and I'll be back with a special program note in a moment. 
<br />
<br />[commercial break] 
<br />
<br />COKIE ROBERTS: Tomorrow night, Ted Koppel moderates a special Nightline town meeting from Jerusalem, 'Thou Shalt Not Kill.' Among the guests, acting Israeli prime minister Shimon Peres and Leah Rabin, widow of the assassinated prime minister. That's our broadcast for tonight. I'm Cokie Roberts in Washington. For all of us here at ABC News, good night.</div>
<br />
<br />Former congressman John Kasich is now the Republican candidate for Ohio governor, challenging incumbent Democrat Ted Strickland. From leaving office in 2001 until late 2008 he was a <a href="http://www.dispatchpolitics.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2010/04/03/copy/kasich-discloses-pay-seeks-to-quiet-critics.html?adsec=politics&sid=101">managing director of investment banking at Lehman Brothers</a> and occasional host/analyst at Fox News.
<br />
<br />Alice Rivlin is a <a href="http://www.brookings.edu/experts/rivlina.aspx">senior fellow at Brookings Institution</a>.
<br />
<br />Here's Newt Gingrich talking about shutting down the government again:
<br /><object width="640" height="385" class="center"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ESG9IrOjX7c&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ESG9IrOjX7c&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
<br />]]></description>
	<link>http://www.castlemzx.net/index.php?i=govshutdown</link>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>The Male Urge to Specialize</title>
	<description><![CDATA[<span class="chat">
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: you're an outcast!
<br />
<br /><span class="red"><span class="red">Edge of Map</span></span>: i'm a jack of all trades!
<br />
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: yes
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: master of none...
<br />
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: mastery is pretty overrated
<br />
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: masters tend to be autistic idiot savants
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: there is an urge, especially in the male organism, to specialize
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: to become vital to society because you are the only one who can do a certain thing
<br />
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: yyyyyessssss
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: who was that idiot who said that everybody should be able to change a baby's diaper, dig a hole, die defending their country, etc.
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: and that specialization was for insects
<br />
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: heinlein
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: i hate that guy...
<br />
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: why
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: lots of reasons, but in THIS case, because it's just a terrible plan! without specialization, civilization would get nowhere
<br />
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: ah, yeah...
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: i WANT to be a specialist, i feel like i just haven't found the right thing to specialize in...
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: i'm acquainted with so many fields not because all of them are important, but because i've looked into all of them and found NONE of them to be important
<br />
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: i don't really want to be a specialist
<br />
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: my job inclination from an early age was to "write" and a little later "to make video games", but mostly only from the perspective of entertaining people
<br />
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: you said that the urge to specialize is especial to the male organism, and i agree, and in addition it seems to me that in women and gay men you tend to see a lot more knitting and interior design and whatever because they start with the assumption that none of those specialities out there are very important
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: you just don't really want anything, though
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: you have no direction at all
<br />
<br /><span class="blue">asgromo</span>: well, yeah, but explain that
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: lack of perspective?
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: if you can't see the forest for the trees, all directions seem to go nowhere
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: maze of twisty passages, all alike
<br />
<br /><span class="red">Edge of Map</span>: people are so helpless, you stick them in any situation without an obvious objective or way out and they just shut down
<br /></span>
<br />]]></description>
	<link>http://www.castlemzx.net/index.php?i=specialization</link>
	<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Death Note Spoilers</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<br /><em>Death Note</em> is a Japanese media franchise. The original story features a demonic artifact capable of killing human beings immediately and without limit, and the young man who discovers and makes extensive use of it.
<br />
<br />While giving <em><a href="http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/">The Authoritarians</a></em> a second try, my mind wandered, and I quickly dug up the following quotes with a google or two. They're full of spoilers, by the way.
<br /><br/>
<br /><img class="center" src="images/deathnote_sob.jpg"/>
<br /><h4>Joshms</h4>
<br />Yes, I felt so bad for Light and all his followers :( the end was depressing. I always wanted Light to win for some reason.
<br />
<br />Anyways, I personally would have just hid the Death Note and given up, because I'm not nearly as smart as Light and would have failed if I knew Near and Mello were after me.
<br />
<br />Is that lame? Yeah, that would have been a terrible ending. lol
<br />But at least I probably would have lived! So in the end I did better than Light.
<br />
<br /><h4>moonlight gurl</h4>
<br />awe, the ending was really sad! -sniff- Light is my favorite character so you can imagine how bad I felt for him too. The closure was definitaly moving.
<br />
<br />Actually after L died I couldn't stand N at all. Thogh I liked Matt and Mello and Kiyomi Takada too. Misa was fun too (I don't know why alot of people hate her) Though I agree she is so annoying at times lol.
<br />
<br />If I were in Light's place I would have told Mikami to tear off a paper from the death note and keep it with him at all times to save it for that special event. That way in the end when Mikami writes the names I will be the only one standing and the rest dead. I learnt from Light's mistake lol! ;)
<br />
<br /><h4>Vidocq</h4>
<br />I didn't feel sorry for Light at all. I was pretty glad he died, He wasn't just a murder, he not only killed bad guys but he also killed innocents who were against him Like L, Those FBIs and his OWN Father. He was an authoritarian and sociopathic asshole who proclaim that he was the god of the new world when he was just a bored kid wanting to make himself more important. Too bad it wasn't L who finished him.
<br />
<br />
<br />I WOULD HAVE BURNED THE MUTHERFUCKING NOTEBOOK TO AVOID IT FROM GOING INTO THE WRONG HANDS, LIKE LIGHTS!
<br />
<br /><h4>Nate_River~</h4>
<br />I didn't think the ending was all that sad, more like thought provoking. The reason I didn't think the ending was all that sad was probably because it's not very easy to grow attached to an ass of a character like Light. But eh, that's just me.
<br />
<br /><h4>bob511</h4>
<br />i think that what kira did was good i mean he killed people including his father for the sake of billions of other humans if he wouldve been succesfull i don't see why people see him as a bad guy , light was a good guy and killed people that deserved/needed to die
<br />
<br /><h4>Prier</h4>
<br />I just saw some of the earlier episodes, read spoilers here and there, and I saw the ending cause I was curious and that was so sad. How can someone not feel bad for him? He looked so sad and scared and in need. No one would help him. He was alone. 
<br />
<br />I dont care how cruel he acted that was too much. He wont even get a afterlife. He is just gone forever. D-= All that and all he wanted was a safe, good, and clean world. 
<br />
<br />I am staying the hell away from this series.
<br />
<br />Does anything good happen to him? Am I missing something? Will he ever get peace? Where does he go when he dies? Anyone know?
<br />
<br /><h4>tse</h4>
<br />DEATH NOTE deals a lot with human psychology. The way how ppl think, ppl do things, ppls' perspectives in live are all included. It talks about the paradox of the humanity ideology. Questions like killing bad people, a crime or not? and a bunch of questions that follow up. Thoughts that we always avoid to think about and complicated ideas which end up like the chicken or the egg first?? If you want some serious stuff and DEEP HUMAN PSYCHOLOGY, you must watch this.
<br />
<br /><h4>elaine tan fui vun</h4>
<br />DEATH NOTE(anime) I already finish watched all........The ending is so sad,i cry when I see Light die,it was not fair...I think all the main chracter die,First Misa's shinigami(deathgod),L,Light,Ryuk(light's shinigami) & misa...
<br />why I think misa & Ryuk wiil die,because Misa say that she cannot live without Light...Ryuk maby die because he let Light die(the truth Light life still did't end yet,but Ryuk let Light die,the Death note say that if shinigami write someone name if the person life still did't end yet,the shinigami wiil turn 2 dust)
<br />Death note live action movie also nice(>-<)
<br />IF want 2 add me~
<br />msn=kingdomhearts5442@hotmail.com
<br />]]></description>
	<link>http://www.castlemzx.net/index.php?i=deathnote</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Government Shutdown 3</title>
	<description><![CDATA[
<br />Here's Newt Gingrich talking about shutting down the government in April of 2010:
<br /><object width="640" height="385" class="center"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ESG9IrOjX7c&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ESG9IrOjX7c&rel=0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
<br />
<br />Yes, yes, all according to plan! Mwa ha ha ha!!1
<br />]]></description>
	<link>http://www.castlemzx.net/index.php?i=govshutdown3</link>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

